Comments on: TYT Episode 10-20-09 (Insane Healthcare Denials, White House Weak On Public Option & More)

By: N5DVC

N5DVC — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:33:06 +0000

Turks – You really don’t understand how government works, do you – you honestly believe the government will not make these same decisions? Are you aware of Canada and the UK?? At all?

lie 2: “Of course Republicans don’t have a plan” They do; it’s called HR3400 and it’s buried in Committee by the Dems. Do some research (or quit lying)

Budget: The CONSTITUTION requires the Federal gov’t to provide ‘a common defence”, NOT health care, or education, or any other states responsibilities.

By: kurdatheist

kurdatheist — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:37:52 +0000

@seismicrob2956
They murdered 1.5 million Armenians..

By: seismicrob2956

seismicrob2956 — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:53:28 +0000

Ok BUBBA……..hahaha…. makes perfect sense

By: FEWSTAR006

FEWSTAR006 — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:50:59 +0000

If you do not like it why do you watch?

By: TheR33l

TheR33l — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:46:47 +0000

Understand that the “CONSITUTION” is not supreme law of the universe. It’s a great document but you must be absurd to think that it has permanence, if there’s a change to make the nation better but it’s not defined in the Constitution, who cares? It doesn’t make sense.

By: CiscoNast

CiscoNast — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:22:58 +0000

depends how pure u want to be

By: conceil8

conceil8 — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:32:21 +0000

CHRISTIANS OF THE WORLD! THE FINAL WILL OF GOD IS UNITY, LOVE AND HOLINESS!

End ChristenDOOM! Leave your churches, no church=no division. Just be perfectly holy: restrain yourself from expressing evil; guard yourself against all filthy influence outside. Be love: help for free, give for free!

By: N5DVC

N5DVC — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:25:31 +0000

So who defines what “better” is? Order and submissiveness is better, right? Totalitarian control accomplishes this in a prison, but I’m not to keen on it in a free society.
This country was founded as a response to oppressive, intrusive government interference. These are our principles. Which other’s get tossed aside because someone thinks it’s better? Speech? Right to fair trial?
So, to answer your question: I care!

By: TheR33l

TheR33l — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:36:42 +0000

Alright back up there. Who defines what ‘better’ is? No one; which is why we have a democracy so the majority can have their way. I love how you compare apples to oranges, and even bring in totalitarianism. Why would anyone in their right mind toss aside speech or the right to a fair trial? No one. This is a democracy.

So again, I ask you, why stick strictly to the constitution while we can exist as a democracy without one?

By: N5DVC

N5DVC — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:45:28 +0000

Actually, this is a Republic, not a democracy. But, what the hell, let’s change that too! It’s really more of a guideline than a rule…
Without limits, mob rules. If I can get a “democratic” 51% vote that all liberals should be tortured and executed, I guess you’re OK with that new law then?
Of course that’s extreme, but Ahmadinejad was elected by “majority” in a government without our constitution to limit his actions. You seem to think it isn’t possible, yet it happens all around us…